General discussion / 10 Sets a day/user

As you all know...LSDB is very slow lately, A lot of new members are registered and that\'s very good news... but the site is getting slow
one other problem is the problem of the amount of sets uploaded by some users (most of them will know that i\'m talking about them)
Some of them post 50 sets on 5 minutes time... That\'s to much
Most of the sets are only downloaded maybe 10 times on the whole period. that\'s why i want to propose something like a limit for the amount of sets posted per day/per user...

Let me know what you think...

ps: If you think you are offended... say it... maybe i will apologize

Thank you

Edited by Xerxes on 09-02-2011 19:19

Nonsense

ik ben voor

I don\'t think that\'s a big problem (regarding the site performance).
I think the biggest problem atm is the genre filtering (only view your favourite genre), because the site has to create a different list of comments/sets for every person that has different favourite genres...

So theoretically, if as much as much people as possible switch that function off till we find a solution, the server might run smoothly?

Not saying that it is, or isn\'t what everyone should do, it would be extremely biased of me to say \"everyone just switch it off for now\", because i already do not use it

Or someone is just LOIC\'ing us nah, j/k

Anyway, even though i don\'t think so, but if there is anything i can do, feel free to ask ! I\'d love to help in any way possible.

On 09-02-2011 19:07:14, Xerxes wrote:

Some of them post 50 sets on 5 minutes time... That's to much
Most of the sets are only downloaded maybe 10 times on the whole period. that's why i want to propose something like a limit for the amount of sets posted per day/per user...

Let me know what you think...

Bedoel je nou 50 sets binnen vijf minuten? En maakt het uit hoevaak een set wordt gedownload? Dan zeker alleen maar populaire setsjes submitten waarvan je denkt dat veel mensen ze downloaden? Beetje rare argumentatie...

edit: offended is a big word.. addressed would be a better choice

On 09-02-2011 19:20:04, mstx wrote:

I don't think that's a big problem (regarding the site performance).

Als het wel het geval is dan ben ik zeker voor een limiet, maar anders niet

Edited by hardcorerepublic on 10-02-2011 01:09

Update just! New layout or something
Maybe fix any problems if you know where their coming from.

On 09-02-2011 19:20:04, mstx wrote:

I think the biggest problem atm is the genre filtering (only view your favourite genre), because the site has to create a different list of comments/sets for every person that has different favourite genres...

*brain stem* Interesting...........

...

Edited by PatrickG88 on 09-02-2011 19:49

Yes, good idea ! (If performances of this website is better)

I edit (about) 5 to 20 livesets per day !

So I will publish the top 10 livesets I would find

Layout ? God idea too

I cant see many people abiding by the rule of only looking at your favourite genre. Most people do that anyway. Plus, i dont really fancy missing out on any decent sets.

How about we just remove some users who use the site regularly that i dont like. That way, i remain in a good mood and the site runs that little bit quicker.

If anyone disagree's, please mail me your thoughts, as your views and opinions are important to me, if they agree with my views and opinions.

Edited by djdesudo on 09-02-2011 20:31

If MSTX says that the amount of sets uploaded is not the main problem, then why bother changing that?

If MSTX says that the filter causes the problem, why not delete the filter? Anyone AGAINST deleting the filter, please say so.

Me, not interested in things like techno industrial and other stuff i don't listen to. Without favourites filter it will take ages to see if interesting new sets are posted.

i barely use the filter anyways

weggejorist en opgerot zo doen ze dat toch altijd?

On 09-02-2011 19:31:20, hardcorerepublic wrote:

Bedoel je nou 50 sets binnen vijf minuten? En maakt het uit hoevaak een set wordt gedownload? Dan zeker alleen maar populaire setsjes submitten waarvan je denkt dat veel mensen ze downloaden? Beetje rare argumentatie...

Wat ik bedoel is dat er personen zijn die 50 setjes op korte tijdspanne hier op de site zetten en dat niemand ze in theorie bekijkt...omdat ze zo snel weg worden geschoven door nieuwe setjes

Ik wil gewoon iets aankaarten en kijken wat jullie er van vinden.

Edited by Xerxes on 09-02-2011 20:50

On 09-02-2011 20:49:36, Xerxes wrote:

[...]

Wat ik bedoel is dat er personen zijn die 50 setjes op korte tijdspanne hier op de site zetten en dat niemand ze in theorie bekijkt...omdat ze zo snel weg worden geschoven door nieuwe setjes

Ik wil gewoon iets aankaarten en kijken wat jullie er van vinden.

Ik begrijp het punt dat je wilt maken en alle goede bedoelingen die daarbij horen... maar je moet realiteit en fictie niet door elkaar halen. Met dat soort comments denken mensen nog echt dat er personen zijn die dat soort upload ratios halen.

En het tweede punt dat je volgens mij probeert te maken is dat door snelle upload ratio van sommige, sets snel naar tweede pagina gaan... terwijl zij zo hard aan hun sets hebben gewerkt toch?? Kom op.. als je hier rekening mee moet gaan houden. Dit vind ik persoonlijk bullshit

Ban alle setjes die niet darkstep, dnb, breakcore, industrial, ambient of other zijn en je mag het genre filter eruit halen van mijn part.

On 09-02-2011 22:04:20, DelugeOfSound wrote:

je mag het genre filter eruit halen

Inderdaad, als dat het probleem is dan lijkt hij mij een kleine moeite om sets die je wil wat beter te zoeken.

wtf we have good uploaders that ul more than that so no


but if some uploaders really ul just rubbish noboy listens maybe then not a bad idea...but also then i think a warning and then a ban is enough

...and at least then i would be a deserved ban